There is a
prevalent and historical problem associated with bilingual programs. Students
from the program have routinely complained of the unfairness of the system that
ignores the specific needs of each learner. Many students have been forced to
stay in the programs for extended durations, lasting up to five years. The
program also fails to identify if English-speaking students are forced to use a
strange tongue when they would have benefitted from remedial help in improving
their academic outcomes. Such conditions are demonstrated by the high dropout
rates among Hispanic students in these programs compared to other racial
segments (Fiske, 1985). These federally supported programs have thus become
associated with broader social and political issues with political stakeholders
using public schools as the new bureaucratic battleground.
The issue
portrays the varying political dimensions held by critics as well as advocates
of bilingual programs. It boils down to the immigration issue as bilingual
programs are normally catered to serve immigrant communities. The program has
attracted political and mainstream attention for its growing costs with the right-wing
questioning the usefulness of investing in such programs. They cite that
bilingual programs minimize the assimilation of these segments of society,
avoiding the integration of these students into American society. They use
their weaknesses to reinforce the need to establish a common language, English,
instead of emphasizing on others. On the other hand, supporters of such
programs are largely left-wing that agitates for the increased wellbeing of all
citizens, regardless of their socioeconomic differences. The controversy is an
explicit indication of institutional prejudice in the American system as a
result of limited political capital. Immigrant communities have been under
systematic and institutional discrimination with the issue remaining prevalent
in this day-and-age of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations
against undocumented immigrants.
Unfortunately,
because of the current school closure circumstances, I wasn’t’ able to talk to
parents about the school relationships. However, I was able to talk to one of
the teachers that I observe about the teacher-parent relationship both in my
classroom and in the school. When speaking, the teacher stressed to me how
important it is to keep a strong relationship with parents. The more the
parents are involved, she finds the better her students do academically. Especially
with the new online learning that is going on currently, it is important to
keep the parents in the loop to keep their children on track. She explained to
me how she uses the app “remind” to communicate with parents daily. This app
allows for the teacher to send messages to the entire class’ parents. The
teacher posts most homework assignments and some classwork on remind everyday
after school so the parents can be involved in what their child is learning. She
also says she constantly reminds parents that her email and phone are constantly
open for any conversations or concerns that need to be had privately. When I
asked the teacher about literacy development, she says she really tries to get
parents on board with reading with their children at home. She stresses how
important reading for 20- 30 minutes a night at home is, especially for
bilingual students. She said most parents are on board with this however, the
parents that are not too involved, she does see a bit of decline in their
children’s work.
References
Fiske. E. B. (1985, November 10). The controversy over bilingual education
in America’s schools; one language
or two? The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/1985/11/10/education/controversy-over-bilingual-education- america-s-schools-one-language-two.html?auth=link-dismiss-google1tap
No comments:
Post a Comment