Bilingualism, Second Language Learning, and Early Childhood
Education
Haley Gibbons
EDBL 603
Dr. Ahn
Bilingualism, Second Language Learning, and Early Childhood
Education
Introduction
The concepts of bilingualism and second-language
learning have gained prominence in the age of globalization, technological
innovations, and cross-cultural interaction. Notably, globalization and
innovations in technologies – especially in transport and communication – have
contributed to an increase in socio-cultural, economic, and political
interactions of people from different regions. The augmented interaction
frameworks resonate with the need for people to learn new languages to improve
communication, business interaction, and promote economic growth and
development. As a result, the dynamics have contributed to the emergence of the
concepts “bilingualism’ and “second-language learning’ which provide a
framework for understanding and improving communication between groups
exhibiting diverse language affiliations. Bilingualism entails a phenomenon
whereby individuals understand and communicate in more than one language (Byers-Heinlein
& Lew-Williams, 2013). Moreover, second-language learning incorporates
numerous frameworks, practices, and approaches intended to improve a person’s
conversancy of a second language (Seker, Girgin, & Akamca, 2012). Another
concept evaluated in the research is Early Childhood Education. The early childhood
education programs are focused on promoting their understanding, learning, and
discernment of basic issues. The study evaluates how past studies address the
issue of bilingualism, second-language learning, and childhood education. Besides,
the research examines the connection between the mentioned concepts and their
implication on learning. The concepts bilingualism, second-language learning,
and childhood education are closely interrelated and interdependent as well as
important in the achievement educational goals and objectives
Review of
Literature
The review focuses on how past studies have evaluated
and addressed the concepts of bilingualism, second-language learning, and early
childhood education. The evaluations emphasize the development of the concepts,
basic assumptions, implications and benefits on children and adults, and
challenges, among other issues. The review is well articulated to provide the
reader with a comprehensive and holistic understanding of the research topic
and concepts.
Notably, numerous studies have
focused on understanding the concepts of bilingualism and its implication in
human education and understanding. One study, Benefits of Bilingualism in Early Childhood: A Booster of teaching
English to Young Learners, evaluates the concept from a scientific
perspective. For instance, the study asserts that the concept has emerged as an
effective framework leading to the spread of the English language all over the
world (Pransiska, 2017). The study also examines the myths and misconceptions
associated with the improved understanding of more than one language. For
instance, it suggests that bilingualism among children resonates with increased
cases of mixing language, language learning problems, cerebral confusion, and split
personality (Pransiska, 2017). Another study, bilingualism in the Early Years: What the Science Says, evaluates common
questions by parents concerning the issue of bilingualism. The study utilizes
scientific findings to separate facts from fiction and assists parents in
making the rights choices on teaching second-languages to their children (Byers-Heinlein
& Lew-Williams, 2013). Notably, the study asserts that bilingualism
improves children learning abilities over the course of their education (Byers-Heinlein
& Lew-Williams, 2013). However, Garcia rebukes the misconception that
understanding multiple languages causes confusion among children (García,
2009). For that reason, understanding the
concept requires one to take a scientific approach in addressing the issue. Besides,
Chin evaluates the benefits and limitations of bilingualism in student
achievement and suggests that the framework assists multicultural societies to
foster inclusion, improve student language skills, and promote learning (2015).
Therefore, despite the misconception associated with bilingualism, the concepts
exhibit numerous benefits for students and learners.
Moreover, the concept of
bilingualism is closely associated with second-language learning. A recent
study, Plasticity, Variability, and Age
in Second-Language Acquisition and Bilingualism, examines the implication
of learning and understanding more than one language relative to age and
culture, among other human characteristics (Birdsong, 2018). The study posits
that the acquisition of second language and bilingualism is influenced by age
factors, which is associated with brain plasticity (Birdsong, 2018). In another
study, the benefits of utilizing a second language in learning relative to
using native language are examined. Notably, Seker et al. (2012) opine that
children receiving education in English exhibited higher processing skills and
abilities when compared to those learning using the Turkish Language. The study
was conducted in Turkey, where English is used as a second language. From this
perspective, learning a second language is considered beneficial for both
children and adults, especially concerning memorization and processing skills. Likewise,
past literature has focused on the need for parents to teach their children a
second-language and push them to become bilingual. One study posits that
children need to be taught to distinguish between diverse languages, which
contributes to an improvement in learning (De Houwer, 2006). The study also remarks
that a majority of children exposed to converse in more than one language tend
to gain proficiency in one of the languages (De Houwer, 2006). Similarly, the
correlation and connection between second language acquisition and human memory
are evaluated comprehensively in Bridging
the Gap between Second-language Acquisition and memory Science: The Case of
Foreign Language Attrition (Mickan, McQueen, & Lemhöfer,
2019). In this study, the authors reveal
that people tend to a foreign language when they stop using it (Mickan et al.,
2019). Therefore, understanding the concept of second language acquisition and
multilingualism is paramount to promoting learning and communication.
Besides, Early Child Education (ECE)
has emerged as an important concept for understanding and promoting learning
and memory processing among individuals from an early age. The study, 2-3 Early Childhood Education Journal Early
Childhood Teachers as Socializers of Young Children’s Emotional Competence, provides
a framework for understanding the nature and implication of a vast assortment
of issues notable in ECE (Denham et al., 2012). Through the study, the author
elaborates on how effective communication, language, and emotional
understanding promote learning for children aged eight years or below (Denham
et al., 2012). A comprehensive evaluation of the outlined factors in ECE
provides a framework for developing and improving learning and knowledge
acquisition for children. For instance, the study notes that effective
communication between students and their teachers contributes to an improvement
in the learning process and promotes information processing (Denham et al.,
2012). In another study, scholars have evaluated the knowledge acquisition and
learning capabilities for children to assist in the development of frameworks
intended to promote learning and cognitive growth (Penn, 2014). The study notes
that children tend to remember things more vividly than adults, especially
concerning memories (Penn, 2014). From this assertion, it is notable that
children have improved capacities and abilities to learn, process, and memorize
new information. Besides, Birdsong concurs with this assertion by stating the
children have high brain plasticity that promotes second-language learning (2018).
Therefore, children exhibit high capacities in learning new languages and
becoming bilingual.
Relationship
between Bilingualism, Second-Language Learning (L2), and ECE
Over
the years, an evaluation of the correlation between bilingualism, second
language learning, and ECE has provided educators, parents, teachers, and other
stakeholders with a framework for understanding and developing policies for
improving education access in a multicultural and high globalized word. The
research focused on evaluating the connection between outlined concepts in
education. For instance, it is notable that bilingualism and second language
learning influences ECE. Conversely, ECE also tends to promote bilingualism and
second language learning among children. Therefore, providing a comprehensive
analysis of the intertwining relationship provides a framework for making
decisions and improving learning.
Benefits of
Bilingualism and L2 on ECE
Notably, the aspects of bilingualism and Second
language learning exhibits numerous benefits on ECE, especially in regards to
cognition, memorization, and information processing. Over the years, studies
have noted that bilingualism contributes to a vast assortment of benefits for
children, which encompass enhanced communication skills, improved educational
performance, heightened cognitive abilities, improved, health, and improvement
in individual creativity (García, 2009). Likewise, the outlined benefits are crucial in
promoting learning for children aged eight years or below. Consequently,
studies have noted that increased cases of bilingualism in children contribute
to improved learning and academic outcomes (Pransiska, 2017). For that reason,
the adoption of bilingual frameworks plays an important role in the achievement
of ECE goals and objectives in the short- and long-term. In addition, learning
a second language is a beneficial undertaking for students in diverse education
fields. One study found that children utilizing using English as a second
language exhibited better information processing processes when compared to
those using local dialects (Seker et al., 2012). For that reason, bilingualism
and L2 is important in promoting the achievement of ECE goals and objectives,
which encompass improved learning, cognition abilities, and academic outcomes.
Consequences Bilingualism
and L2 on ECE
Nonetheless, promoting bilingualism and second
language learning among children is associated with an increase in potential
negative implications on learning. One common expressed fear of promoting both
concepts relates to the perception that teaching the second language to
children contributes to increased confusion in terms of cognition and
communication (García, 2009).
Studies conducted on bilingual immigrants and monolingual children born in the
U.S. have contributed to the propagation of such phobia. The researches –
conducted in the early 1900s – noted that monolinguals performance better than
bilinguals (De Houwer, 2006). From this perspective, teaching children a second
language contributes to a decline in their performance and information
processing. However, recent studies have refuted such claims by terming them as
misconceived and not scientifically proven. For instance, one study has
suggested that bilingualism and the study of a second language do not confuse
children but rather improves their sensitivity to information (Byers-Heinlein
& Lew-Williams, 2013). Considering that, the consequences of bilingualism among
children remain in contention between different factions of the scholarly
debate. Therefore, more research on the implications of the concepts on ECE
needs to be conducted to provide different stakeholders with a coherent, comprehensive,
and viable framework for making educational decisions.
The intersection
between the three concepts
Bilingualism, second-language learning, and early
childhood education exhibit numerous points of intersection, which is
associated with the interrelation and interdependence among the three concepts.
Notably, studies have defined bilingualism as the ability to understand and
converse in two languages (Byers-Heinlein & Lew-Williams, 2013). However,
the connection between bilingualism and second language learning cannot be
ignored. Second language learning remains one of the most important frameworks
for promoting bilingualism today (Birdsong, 2018). A recent study has posited
that a majority of bilingual individuals in the United States have acquired
their proficiency in multiple dialects through second language learning (García,
2009). Considering that, second language
learning contributed to bilingualism by assisting monolingual speakers to
become bilingual or – in some cases – multilingual. Therefore, the adoption of
second language learning mechanisms attributes to an increase in bilingualism
in society. In addition, both bilingualism and L2 are also closely associated
with ECE. For instance, it is notable that ECE entails the adoption of
effective programs for promoting learning for children below eight years and
below (Penn, 2014). Besides, studies have commended that such children exhibit
increased plasticity in the brain, which improves their memories and
information processing (Birdsong, 2018). Based on that, the adoption of such
frameworks in L2 would play a fundamental role in improving bilingualism in
society.
Importance on ECE
in Second Language Learning and Bilingualism and Methodology
Over the years, a majority of studies have focused on
the implication of learning a second language and bilingualism in learning and
information processing in children aged eight years or below. Minimal studies
have been dedicated to understanding the implication of adopting ECE frameworks
on L2 and bilingualism. However, a recent study has emphasized on the
importance of ECE programs on improving learning among children, which is
crucial to promoting education outcomes (Seker et al., 2012). The study
commends that, considering the capacity of children to learn and memorize
information better than adults, adopting ECE programs in teaching a second
language would be effective in promoting bilingualism (Seker et al., 2012). In
most developing nations, children are taught English from an early age as a
second language and they grow up exhibiting improved proficiency and
dialectical prowess in both native and second language. From this perspective,
the application of ECE programs and frameworks in promoting bilingualism is not
a new concept. Considering that, the process remains important in improving
learning, cross cultural communication, and academic outcomes. Therefore, the
concepts of bilingualism, second-language learning, and early childhood
education are interrelated and somewhat interdependent.
There a number of
different methods when approaching how to teach a bilingual student. The two
that I have found most research on and that I am most familiar with are the
transitional and the ESL (English as a second language) approach. The
transitional is what I mostly observe in and is comprised of one classroom with
two teachers. The class is taught in both English and the second language,
gradually building up to mostly English. The ESL approach is a pullout method
where second language learners are pulled from their classroom weekly to
reinforce their English skills.
Conclusion
The concepts second language learning (L2),
bilingualism, and Early Childhood Education (ECE) are somewhat interrelated and
interdependent, which provides a comprehensive framework for improving
communication and learning. Over the years, literature has focused on
understanding the three concepts to provide a framework for decision making in
the education sector. The literature has focused on evaluating the nature,
conception, and implication of bilingualism, L2, and ECE from global and
national contexts. Notably, bilingualism and L2 exhibits numerous benefits as
well as consequences on ECE, which tend to influence decision and policy making
in the sector. L2 and bilingualism contributes to improvements in children
learning capabilities, improved communication, and cognitive abilities. However,
there exists fears attributing the two concepts to increased confusion in
language and communication for students. Besides, there is an intersection
between the three concepts, especially based on the adoption of ECE programs
intended to promote L2 and improve bilingualism for individuals and society. Therefore,
there exist a correlation and interdependence among concepts, which provides a
framework for understanding and improving education in multicultural societies.
References
Birdsong, D. (2018).
Plasticity, Variability and Age in Second Language Acquisition and
Bilingualism. Frontiers in Psychology, 9.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00081
Byers-Heinlein, K., &
Lew-Williams, C. (2013). Bilingualism in the Early Years: What the Science
Says. LEARNing Landscapes, 7(1), 95–112.
Chin, A. (2015). Impact
of bilingual education on student achievement. IZA World of Labor.
https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.131
De Houwer, A. (2006).
Bilingual Language Development: Early Years. Encyclopedia of Language &
Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00842-7
Denham, S., Bassett, H.,
& Zinsser, K. (2012). 2 3 Early Childhood Education Journal Early Childhood
Teachers as Socializers of Young Children’s Emotional Competence. Early
Childhood Education Journal, 40, 137–143.
García, O. (2009).
Chapter 8: Education, Multilingualism and Translanguaging in the 21st Century.
In Social Justice through Multilingual Education. Bristol, UK:
Multilingual Matters.
Mickan, A., McQueen, J.
M., & Lemhöfer, K. (2019). Bridging the Gap between Second Language
Acquisition Research and Memory Science: The Case of Foreign Language
Attrition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00397
Penn, H. (2014). Understanding
Early Childhood. Retrieved from
https://books.google.co.ke/books/about/Understanding_Early_Childhood.html?id=U4NFBgAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=kp_read_button&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Pransiska, R. (2017,
January 1). Benefits of Bilingualism in Early Childhood: A Booster of
Teaching English to Young Learners.
https://doi.org/10.2991/icece-16.2017.68
Seker, P. T., Girgin, G.,
& Akamca, G. O. (2012). A Study on the Contributions of Second Language
Education to Language Development in Pre-school Period. Procedia - Social
and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 230–234.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.643
No comments:
Post a Comment